anger in communication Essay -- essays research papers

Anger In CommunicationCommunicating is the means of transmitting or the exchange of development. These types of exchanges usu onlyy occur in many different forms or means. Humans communicate both verbally and nonverbally. The term also refers to sharing or to make common and is defined as a process of understanding. (Pearson & Nelson, 2000 p.18). This process is an activity, an exchange, or a set of behaviors.(Pearson & Nelson, 2000 p.170). These processes or exchanges can become to crossness, which may in some cases, produce results of serious consequences. Anger can be defined as a great feeling of displeasure, wrath, fury, or indignation. Misunderstanding during the exchange of information will create conflicts. These conflicts must be resolved to enable communication in a mundane atmosphere. Disagreements and misunderstandings in communication may result in substantive conflict. These substantive conflict or intrinsic conflicts as defined in human communication, are disagreem ent over ideas, meanings, issues and other matters, will all lead to communicative anger. (Pearson & Nelson, 2000 p.145).Anger in our communicating with others can be confrontational. These occurrences may result in physical abuses or mental abuses. The venom of anger rages throughout our society today, regardless of culture or elegance or community standings. Today I will examine the interpersonal communication within my cohabiting relationship. I will discuss the confrontations, the displayed behaviors, the physical attacks, and the reprisals. For interpersonal relationship to be successful, there must be mutually positive communication present at all metre. My relationship is far the opposite and is continuously plagued with confrontations. The underlying reason stems from the very aggressive behavior of my partner. There seems to be no behavioral tractability in the ability to adapt to new situations and to relate in new ways when necessary. (Pearson, 2000). These adaptations are an integral part of communication in any interpersonal relationships.In my relationship there seems to be a confrontational attitude each time that we discuss any state of affair that may personify in our daily living. A recent confrontation took place, when she asked to borrow a sum of m integrityy, which I promptly giveed her until such time as she had requested. The time came when the loan should be re... ...ative behaviors that may have exploded in anger could be from our failure to divulge to our partners information that we may consider to be negative. Defensiveness and being self-involved are causes that lead to destructive relationships. Because of the anger and failure of communication in our relationship I eventually decided to call it quits. But after foster discussion I suggested to her if she would seek counseling for her aggressive behaviors, I would be willing to try, and continue if there is improvement. She is now in counseling for the second time thru my companys counseling program. She seemed to calm down, and her communication has dramatically improved. We all want to have successful interpersonal relationships. We want to be able to want others and to self-disclose to them. We must be able to handle conflicts, and to use conflict resolution techniques that are mutually satisfying for all. Controlling our anger will eventually lead us to communicate more effectively. We must ultimately learn that communication is dependent on the interaction between two or more persons, and one person cannot guarantee its success (Pearson & Nelson, 2000 p.178).

History of the Euro Essay -- Europe Eurpean Currency Money Essays

History of the EuroAfter the long awaited single currency implementation known as the euro, there have been many ups and downs to this monetary system. galore(postnominal) have been quick to criticize while others still praise its value claiming it will soon be valued strongly against the dollar. Our paper looks into the various aspects of the euro and the shape up it has made since its initiation. We begin with a brief history of the euro then move on by raising some questions concerning the effects of the euro on various frugal aspects such as competition and global financial institutions. We then provide insight to the various strengths and weaknesses of the euro and the implications this currency has on various institutions such as banks. We intermit the paper by presenting a number of challenges the euro may face in the near future, as well as its current conditions.IntroductionRecently in Europe and its neighboring countries, the talk has been about the newly installed euro into the ever- growing European market. The euro has been the new currency for the twelve countries belonging to Euroland since January 1, 2002. The countries that have adopted the euro are the future(a) Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, the Republic of Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. The big motivation behind the euro is to enable a market that more and more looks like one European market. The goal is for the European upper-case letter market to be as efficient as possible, as this is a prerequisite for sustainable economic development. To better understand how the euro came about, one must go back to 1979. This is when the idea of the euro was in its very first phase. History of the EuroOn March ... .../html/rubrique-cadre5html?pag=rubrique- europa5.html/lang=5/chap18/rubrique=261 The European Union in Your Hand7)Eltis, Walter. Euro cut into Panel. www.kingston.ac.uk/en_5007/euro/eurosum.htm8)www.fortune.com 9)Ga zi, Ercel Governor of Central Bank of Turkey. Dunya Gazetesi, Euro Meeting, Istanbul, Nov 27, 199810)George, Edward Progress of the Euro. www.bis.org/review/r001024.a.pdf11)Hersch, Warren. Computer Reseller News. Euro Progress Crawls Along. Manhasset Feb 21, 200012)www.howstuffworks.com/euro7.htm13)International Effects of the Euro. www.brook.edu/dybdocroot/com/Policybriefs/Pb042/pb42.htm14)White, William The Euro and Financial Markets Challenges for Bankers and Policymakers. www.bis.org/speeches/sp991113.htm15)http//cobweb.creighton.edu/cps/ Euro

Analysis of On the Waterfront Essay -- Eliza Kazan, Budd Schulberg

On the Waterfront is a classic, award-winning and controversial film. It received eight academy-awards in 1954, including best-picture and director. The director, Eliza Kazan, in collaboration with Budd Schulberg wrote the films screenplay. Based on actual dockside events in Hoboken, New Jersey, On the Waterfront is a story of a dock role player who tried to overthrow a corrupt union. Marlon Brando superbly portrays the character of Terry Malloy. He is a young ex-prize fighter, now a dock worker given(p) easy jobs because his brother is the right-hand man of the corrupt union boss Johnny Friendly. After Terry unwittingly allows himself to be used in consideration up a mans death, he starts to question the basic assumptions if his life. This includes his loyalty to his brother and Johnny, who subsequently all ordered him to take a soak up in his big fight at Madison Square Garden. The films controversy exists in the fact that Terry decides to testify against Johnny Friendly. His affidavit attempts to show how it is fundamentally right to break group silence in a tough situation, even if a person appears to rat on his friends. To be at peace with oneself, Kazan seems to say, one must tell the truth, despite the fact that one will face ostracism, and, as in the film, probably be murdered. Kazan makes the hardships of testifying distressingly clear. Thus, Brandos character is a hero. However, a dark schedule exists behind the films plot.On the Waterfront was made in 1954, two years after Kazan willingly testified before the House Un-American Activities Committee. In 1952, Kazan named the names of eight friends and colleges allegedly affiliated with the communist party. Kazan was an active member of the communist party in the 1930s, until he went through a violent break with the party prior to the hearings. He said that communism could override a persons apprehension and beliefs. He also stated that Hollywood and Broadway heavily financed the party. Recounting his decision to testify, Kazan said, Communists were in a lot of organizations--unseen, unrecognized, unbeknownst to anybody. I thought if I siret talk, nobody will know about it.On the Waterfront is Kazans justification for his decision to testify. In the film, when a union boss shouts, You ratted on us Terry, Brando shouts back Maybe from where your standing, but Im standing over here no... ...Youre a cheap, lousy, dirty stinkin mug. And Im glad what Ive done to you, disturbed some the great unwashed. Critics interpreted this to mean that Kazan was not sorry for his severely damaging testimony. It appeared that he had no remorse for his actions. For other viewers, the buried agenda of On the Waterfront tarnishes the picture. The critic John Rosenbaum told Roger Ebert that he could Never forgive Kazan for using the film to justify himself.In later years, Kazan did eventually have remorse for the people whose lives he ruined and the blemish his testimony left on the whole film industry. In his 1988 autobiography he says, I have some declension about the human cost of it. One guy I told on I really like a lot. Twenty years later, unlike On the Waterfronts victorious ending, in Kazans picture The Visitor, a man also testifies against former friends however, that movie ends on a note of despair. Perhaps the rowing of a legendary character he helped to create, haunted Kazan. As Terry Malloy said, Conscience. That stuff can drive you nuts.BibliographyReferences1. Dirks, Tim. On the Waterfront Greatest Films.2. Cannon, Damian. On the Waterfront.

Roman Aqueducts :: essays research papers

Ancient Rome had eleven major aqueducts, built between 312 B.C. (Aqua Appia) and 226 A.D. (Aqua Alexandria) the daylong (Anio Novus) was 59 miles long. It has been calculated that in imperial times, when the citys population was well over a million, the distribution system was able to provide over one three-dimensional meter of irrigate per day for each inhabitant more than we use nowadays. For most of their length the early aqueducts were simply channels bored through the rock, from the water intake in the hills almost to the distribution cistern in Rome. The depth of the channel below ground varied so as to maintain a constant, very shallow gradient (less than 1/200) throughout the length of the aqueduct vertical shafts were bored at intervals to provide ventilation and access. Only in the final stretches was the conduit raise on arches, to give a sufficient head for distribution of the water within the city. In order to keep the gradient constant, the aqueducts took a roundab out route, following the contours of the land and heading along spurs which led towards Rome. The most dramatic parts of a Roman aqueduct wereand still arethe bridges (also known as arcades) that carried the water over low spots in the terrain. Perhaps the best-known of these is the Pont du Gard, a part of the aqueduct that served the town in Nmes in Gaul (todays France). The bridge stands on three tiers of arches and has a length of 274 m (900 ft). Built without the use of mortar, it stands 49 m (160 ft) above the Borngre Ravine. Another famous Roman aqueduct is the one in Segovia, Spain it still carries water, although it did need restoration in the 15th century. s time went on, Roman engineers became more daring in the construction of high arches to support the conduits perilways valleys and plains and some of the later aqueducts were as much as 27 meters (about 100 feet) above ground level in places. Closed pipes were occasionally used to cross valleys by the "inverted syp hon" method the pressure forced the water down and up again on the other side, to a level slimly lower than before. But this system was costly, as it required lead pipes (lead had to be imported from Spain or Great Britain) and it was difficult to make joints strong enough to make the pressure so arches were far more common.

Felon disenfranchisement Essay -- Criminal Justice

One of the more disputed debates in todays political arena, especially around pick times, is that of felon disenfranchisement. The disenfranchisement of felons, or the practice of denying felons and ex-felons the correctly to choose, has been in practice before the colonization of America and traces back to early England however, it has not become so controversial and publicized until recent times. In todays political system, felons and ex-felons are the only competent adults that are denied the right to ballot the total of those banned to vote is approximately 4.7 million men and women, over two percent of the nations population (Reiman 3). Many people believe that felons do not deserve the right to vote. For these people, voting is not an inherent right rather it is a privilege given to deserving people that wish to make a verificatory change to their lives. Some believe that, there is no reason for a felon to vote or to debate about whether or not they require that righ tthey made the choice to break the law, so why should they have any say in making it? Siegel In this point of view, giving felons the right to vote is similar to rewarding them. With the right to vote, felons are still able to sway decisions regarding the lives of a society they are no longer a wear of. Felons are meant to be punished, stripped of numerous rights including that of voting. Punishments, then, are made to restrict a person, not give them more freedom and decision. If felons are allowed to vote, one essential consider the effects it would have on the elections. Many people believe that felons make the wrong choices for a reason, that they are clearly lacking something law-abiding citizens have. professor Christopher Manfredi ... ..., Parole, and Community Corrections. Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall, 2005.Jeffrey Reiman. Liberal and Republican Arguments Against the Disenfranchisement of Felons. Criminal Justice Ethics 24.1 (2005) 3-18. Cri minal Justice Periodicals. ProQuest. Ryan Library, New Rochelle, NY. 13 Dec. 2007. http//www.proquest.com/.Losing the Vote. 1998. The Sentencing Project. 11 Jan. 2007. http//www.hrw.org/reports98/vote/usvot98o.htm.Siegel, Larry J. Criminology. 8th ed. Lowell Thomson Wadsworth, 2003.United States. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 2002. Albany The Hindelang Criminal Justice Research Center, 2003.United States. Federal Bureau of Investigations. Uniform discourtesy Reports. Sept. 2007. 12 Feb 2007. http//www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/index.html

Reconstruction :: essays research papers

     At the end of the Civil War there was a period of cartridge holder in the United States known as the reconstruction period, that lasted for about a decade. During this period the country was in a state of rebuilding. M wizardy, bonds, and stocks were worth nonhing. Forty green United State citizens were dead or gone, and cities lay in ruin. The dream of an independent nation was just that, an unrealistic dream. The south had lost entire cities to end of war and needed to not only rebuild them but also revive its cotton industry. During both the civil war and civil war reconstruction time periods, there were many changes going on in the Union. The Emancipation Proclamation, as well as legislation such as the thirteenth, fourteenth and ordinal amendments, was causing a new awakening of democracy while the renouncing of secession by the South marked a definite triumph for Nationalism. As well, the political relation was involved in altercations of its own . During reconstruction, the legislative and executive branches eventually came to blows over the use of power. The nation was being altered by forces which caused, and later repaired, a broken Union.       chair Lincoln wanted everything to return to normal as quickly as possible after the war. Therefore, Lincoln announced the freeing of all slaves in areas not in Union control. Although the proclamation did not free all slaves everywhere, it was the action that would push Congress to pass the thirteenth amendment in 1865. The amendment, ratified later in 1865, stated that "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude . . . shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction." Lincoln also established a plan for reconstruction, which was deemed the Ten Percent Plan. Even before the war ended, Lincoln knew there would be a need of a plan of reconstruction. Lincoln issued a proclamation of amnesty and reconstruction for the people in the south. The proclamation basically forgave and Confederate for trying to secede from the Union if he would swear to support the piece of the United States and the Union. Politically, Lincoln would recognize the state executively if one tenth of the conquered states total vote in the presidential election f 1860 took an sworn statement of allegiance to the union and organized a government that got rid of slavery. The Radical Republicans wanted a slower readmission process so they trued to pass the Wade-Davis Bill, which would make one half of eligible voters to take the oath of allegiance and accept emancipation.

Reconstruction :: essays research papers

     At the end of the Civil War there was a period of time in the United States known as the reconstruction period, that lasted for about a decade. During this period the country was in a conjure of rebuilding. Money, bonds, and stocks were worth nonhing. Forty thousand United State citizens were dead or gone, and cities lay in ruin. The dream of an independent nation was just that, an unrealistic dream. The south had lost entire cities to destruction of war and needed to not sole(prenominal) rebuild them but also revive its cotton industry. During both the civil war and civil war reconstruction time periods, there were many changes red on in the Union. The Emancipation Proclamation, as well as legislation such as the thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth amendments, was causing a new change of democracy while the renouncing of secession by the South marked a definite triumph for Nationalism. As well, the government was involved in altercations of its own. D uring reconstruction, the legislative and executive branches eventually came to blows over the use of power. The nation was being altered by forces which caused, and later repaired, a broken Union.      President Lincoln wanted everything to return to pattern as quickly as possible after the war. Therefore, Lincoln announced the freeing of all slaves in areas not in Union control. Although the proclamation did not free all slaves everywhere, it was the action that would push Congress to pass the thirteenth amendment in 1865. The amendment, ratified later in 1865, stated that "Neither slavery nor willing servitude . . . shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction." Lincoln also established a plan for reconstruction, which was deemed the Ten Percent Plan. as yet before the war ended, Lincoln knew there would be a need of a plan of reconstruction. Lincoln issued a proclamation of amnesty and reconstruction for the spa te in the south. The proclamation basically forgave and Confederate for trying to secede from the Union if he would swear to support the Constitution of the United States and the Union. Politically, Lincoln would recognize the state executively if one tenth of the conquered states total vote in the presidential election f 1860 took an blaspheming of allegiance to the union and organized a government that got rid of slavery. The Radical Republicans wanted a slower readmission process so they trued to pass the Wade-Davis Bill, which would make one half of eligible voters to take the oath of allegiance and accept emancipation.